Public Building

  • Studio_pr_msc_3-4
  • Wit-half
  • Studio_pr_ankara_msc_3-4
  • Bc_msc3

MSc 3/4

For more information about the different MSc 3/4 studios, click the following links:

MSc 3/4 Studio Public Realm - Urban redevelopment in relation to public realm: New programmes and strategies (AR3Ap130-1 Rotterdam) - start in autumn and spring semester (Q1 & Q2)

Within the theme of context and modernity in the 21st century the research and design studio focuses on ‘public buildings’ in the Netherlands. It explores the meaning of public realm in architecture. New programs and strategies have to be developed to meet the city’s social, political and economic problems and needs in the 21st century. The studio focuses upon innovative concepts and typologies for public buildings in the Netherlands, which address the search for a new public realm within cities. This can only be reached by understanding the crucial moments in urban and architectural practice such as sustainability, stacking of functions, public safety, accessibility, the notion of private and public, formal and informal.

Research and design proposals for the inner city site in Rotterdam, known as the ‘OMA cube’s site’, can provide new programs and strategies in relation to the city’s future development. On the one hand sites can accommodate social, cultural and educational institutions that function on the level of the city region as a whole. On the other hand, solutions can be generated for local problems, such as the lack of cultural and spatial exchange, small-scale creative industries or the question how to integrate ‘Verdure’ (Green) within the design of public buildings. Thus the research and design studio public realm is apt to result in projects and visions on a larger urban scale, as well as in site-specific interventions.

[more info] [Student Work]
 
 
MSc 3/4 Studio Public Realm - “UtopiAnkara”  (AR3Ap130-1 Ankara) - start in autumn semester (Q1)
 
   Having been the centre for the republican revolution against Ottoman Empire centred in Istanbul, Ankara became the capital city of the new nation state in 1923 just two weeks before the declaration of the republic. The first quarter of the republic portrayed its ambition for modernization by building its capital inviting many foreign architects, planners, designers and sculptors. Although foreign designers had been invited to prepare schemes and alternatives for Istanbul in the period of Ottoman Empire, none of those former initiatives reflect the ambition of the young republic in 1930’s. Carl Chistopher Lörcher’s (1884-1966) plan in 1924-1925 laid the foundation of the city plan in 1932 by Herman Jansen (1869 Aachen – 1945 Berlin), which gave the city its core layout first in the north-south and then east-west axes. The basis laid out by Lörcher’s plan was stabilized by Jansen’s proposed scheme. Meanwhile, the political figures of the republic lead by the first president M. Kemal Atatürk were in search/endeavour to draw the frame of the modern identity for the new nation. Many Austrian, German and Swiss architects like Bruno Taut, Clemens Holzmeister, Ernst Egli were part in the projection and construction of that ideal image of the new capital.
  • This is as much a pragmatic as an ideological decision; the case of Ankara allows us to contemplate on the capability of the disciplines of architecture and urbanism to frame and/or mediate the contemporary issues of the city and its emergent desires.
  • The failure of another “utopia” in Ankara provokes radical thinking and by focusing on its contemporary condition with all the failures and potentials we aim to focus on a debate about the potential roles of architecture not only as a delicate instrument in the production of urban environment but also as a cultivator and catalyst for design strategies.
  • This studio will focus on the skills and tools of the architect.
  • Through plans, sections, perspectives, but also through details, materializations or other specific evocations the architect should be able to convey his/her true intentions.
  [more info] [Student Work]
 
 
MSc 3/4 Studio Border Conditions & Territories - Mapping the visible/invisible (AR3Ap130-2)
 

Under the ironic title ‘Untergang des Abendlandes’ studio Border Conditions & Territories (BC&T) will visit the sites of monetary crisis within the European context, however not to investigate the onslaught of the monetary crisis nor to confirm a negative, fatalistic outlook on the economic turmoil and its spatial consequences (in other words the real Untergang), but precisely to look for alternatives in the existing urban and territorial conditions. Previous investigations into Rome’s and Madrid’s peripheries already show that 'other' spatial conditions exist or have emerged as the ones that are 'teeming with suggestive meanings and unexpected potential' but have hardly been analysed and discussed within the contemporary architectural discourse.

The studio will develop architectural research and design projects that are related to and situated in urban conditions as well as embedded in the larger scale of the territory. Interpreting the border as a ‘space of encounter', the studio’s investigations focus on the on-going colonization and appropriation of the landscape around European cities, which has resulted in a fragmented periphery where specific urban border conditions have emerged in a vast territorial setting. The contemporary debates involving both social, ethnic, religious, societal and economic (‘post-capitalist’) developments, will be analysed, as well as the specific forms of resistance that have an influence and effect on the spatial configuration of these cities.

[more info] [Student Work Border Conditions] [Student Work Public Territory]


Theory Seminars for all MSc 3 students

Research Methods AR3A160
Seminar Research Methods AR3A170
Tutorial Research Methods AR3A180